@janwinter15 Rule #1: people who leave their own sensitive info exposed will probably ALSO (and did) leave 21M other people exposed.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel so the "eye for an eye" rule applies? btw, do you agree w/WL hosting his SF 86 form?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @janwinter15
@janwinter15 Moreover, IC does, in fact, strip clearance fr people who can't guard info. Standards should be higher for top official on same1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel if Classified not PII data was on his account then it has to have consequences. same as with HRC1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @janwinter15
@janwinter15 You're changing subject entirely. He had sensitive data stashed in an AOL server, just like he left 21M people stashed at OPM1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel the CIA didn't use OPM? http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/09/cia-officers-pulled-from-china-because-of-opm-breach/ …pic.twitter.com/ybQqb0SrAN
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @janwinter15
@janwinter15 When a DB w/all State's clearance data gets hacked, it tends to ID who the non-State people working as State are.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel OPM breach was embarrassing and caused a lot of damage. no doubt about that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @janwinter15
@janwinter15 Right. And I'm suggesting it arises out of a culture that appoints Brennan to D/CIA w/o asking abt past cyber failures.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel w/that principle I agree. (and in the private sector we do). I guess I missed this nuance in your 1st tweet1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@janwinter15 The standard for competence should be higher in public sector, at least for those in top IC positions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.