Disappointing excuses from @sulliview for the Times largely ignoring the Drone Papers. "We've covered drones a lot" http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/publiceditor/2015/10/26/did-times-underplay-drone-program-leak/ …
-
-
@emptywheel WaPo has always had power in DC. Nobody in NY has cared about it until recently.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel but I guess I disagree with the premise. The Times not covering something doesn't make them not the arbiter.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel It just means the Times doesn't find the Drone Papers fit to print. which is a problem, imo.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel despite the wave of powerful new media including the intercept, the Times has loads of power. -
@onekade Sure. But unless you WANT them to have that power, you shouldn't demand that they have it. -
@emptywheel I don't think demanding they cover important issues solidifies their power, unless you think acknowledging something cements it -
@onekade I think better to call them out when they get to stories late. But on this one, they haven't. -
@emptywheel well i'm not sure what we're disagreeing about at this point honestly ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.