@emptywheel @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq That's not the issue Snowden raised. How about sticking to the issue.
@BradMossEsq Maybe go watch Citizenfour, where he explained that. You don't have same OpSec that Poitras has @MarkSZaidEsq @JesselynRadack
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack So it's not that NSA isn't spying on Poitras, it's that her crypto hasn't been broken? -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack And I did watch Citizenfour, if only so people couldn't say I hadn't
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack It must be great to be u Marcy. Don't need proof, just odds & probabilities to reach conclusions. -
@BradMossEsq I've cited 2 sets of minimization procedures, 3 court cases, and 1 IG Report.@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack None of which shows they target and read ALL emails of ALL lawyers at ALL times -
@BradMossEsq No, they show your non-indicted clients are fair game if they're otherwise targeted.@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack "if they're otherwise targeted" -- well that's nice but again Snowden didn't give that caveat -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack Did Snowden know he was otherwise targeted already? Evidence of that? -
@BradMossEsq You guys are making a great commercial for "Don't Give a Fuck abt Clients' Risks."@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack You're making a great commercial for "memorizing reports makes me an expert" - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack GG neither, but Snowden tried to get GG to use it.pic.twitter.com/0EJJ4j24wo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.