Question on Stingray guidance. PRTT only gets noticed to defendants if evidence intro'ed. Warrants not so. Does this = notice? @NateWessler
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Amie Stepanovich Retweeted Amie Stepanovich
Amie Stepanovich added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Right, but even in future, does the warrant requirement if applicable = notice?@NateWessler1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@NateWessler I'd assume so, but I'm actually curious how it will comply with the FBI-driven NDA1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich@emptywheel I think that going forward, defense attorneys should get copies of warrant and warrant application in most cases3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateWessler
@NateWessler@emptywheel New policy is trying to keep courts from ruling warrant and notice are mandatory, esp if no notice in old cases2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey Right, but if most known uses can be exigent, and those don't require warrants, isn't that the way around it?@NateWessler1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I wonder whether the policy requires notice going forward in cases involving exigent uses@NateWessler2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@PatrickCToomey Bet you quarter it doesn't. Which would be interesting bc I bet vague one incl public safety use (eg Marathon) @NateWessler
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.