All in favor of beating up Josh Duggar for hypocrisy, but shouldn't continued presence at voluntary rehab be subject to HIPAA? @PogoWasRight
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@PogoWasRight Good question. But since it was a non-medical fake church "rehab" I'm not sure HIPPA would apply.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SaltPotatoes
@SaltPotatoes Prolly not. But isn't he still due some privacy out of respect?@PogoWasRight2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@The media frenzy is ridiculous, but the public feeds it. Being a celebrity doesn't mean you should have no right to privacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PogoWasRight
@PogoWasRight@emptywheel tonight's Privacy Law class was celeb privacy & 1st Am! he came up; we decided no privacy for him was really harsh2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wendyck
@wendyck@PogoWasRight@emptywheel But watch out for newsworthiness and public figure arguments.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jvagle
@jvagle@wendyck@emptywheel And public curiosity over salacious details does not make something newsworthy, Gizmodo notwithstanding.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@PogoWasRight You didn't mean Gawker notwithstanding? @jvagle @wendyck
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.