@RadioFreeTom Yup. And you posted a piece yourself accusing people of saying things they hadn't said. Do you not like them?
-
-
-
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Actually, as I showed earlier, no. Your use of English and logic in that piece was a total hash. Do you not like them?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I quoted them. Wait, didn't I just say that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Do you not like Max Fisher (even while as you quoted just bits of him)? Do you not like@ArmsControlWonk (tho you admire him)?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I quoted them. Third time's the charm!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Do you not like them? Your question. Oh wait. Maybe one can criticize someone w/o liking or disliking? What a thought?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You posted a very personal attack on George Jahn's professionalism. Do you agree with that critique or not?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom So no. I think Jim's piece--and underlying 10 or so--are far less person than your hash job in today's DB. DO you like them?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You don't think calling a reporter a dishonest tool of a political group isn't personal?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RadioFreeTom Oops. There you go again, inventing stuff. Where did you get dishonest from?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So, "a tool of the Iran Deal opponents" means "but basically an honest reporter?"0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.