@RadioFreeTom I also think @cherylrofer and @ArmsControlWonk have raised some worthwhile questions independent of story as it exists now.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel Of course they have, But that's not what this discussion is about.@cherylrofer@ArmsControlWonk1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Working on dinner. Let me just end by saying I was taught that critical questions aren't evil.@cherylrofer@ArmsControlWonk1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel And I'll just say I was taught that conspiracy theories aren't actual "theories"@cherylrofer@ArmsControlWonk2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom No one you're talking to now is asserting one. You're the one labeling normal sourcing "plot."@cherylrofer@ArmsControlWonk1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel "tool of Iran deal opponents" :).@cherylrofer@ArmsControlWonk2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Tho there are many cases where you have also asserted certain journos were getting a certain view fr sources. That a plot too?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel If you mean it, then go ahead and say it: "Jahn is a tool of the Iran deal opponents." Have the courage of your convictions3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom And note I can say that and still believe any of 5 explanations for that draft could be true. I'm not the one assuming it is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel Occam's Razor. I do not believe a major news org lies unless I have better reason than that you don't like them.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@RadioFreeTom Again, I'M not claiming they're lying (nor are @cherylrofer or @ArmsControlWonk). I think they reported a badly vetted story.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.