.@emptywheel So, you're saying the document is a fake? @cherylrofer
-
-
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom Not at all. I have no idea. I do have questions some people want to dodge.@cherylrofer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel "I'm just asking questions." So, is it a fake or not? AP says: Word for word transcription. You disagree?@cherylrofer3 replies 4 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom@emptywheel Of course, the problem is "word for word transcription" of what?1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CherylRofer
.
@cherylrofer So, you think they transcribed a fake, or a plant?@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
@RadioFreeTom You really haven't read my article, have you? I said it looks like a draft. http://warontherocks.com/2015/08/how-the-ap-got-the-iran-inspections-story-wrong/ …@emptywheel1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CherylRofer
@cherylrofer Which AP said it was assured was essentially the final. Which WH said again today.@emptywheel4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RadioFreeTom
.
@RadioFreeTom I find it hard to believe Iran would sign off on a document calling it the Islamic State of Iran@cherylrofer@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorganCarlston
.
@RadioFreeTom given this, the question is: did Jahn make mistakes, or was the document far from final?@cherylrofer@emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorganCarlston
.
@MorganCarlston Or is the report of the doc simply *accurate*? Why is that not a possibility?@cherylrofer@emptywheel4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RadioFreeTom Report "of" document probably (not definitely) accurate. That's unrelated to whether source is @MorganCarlston @cherylrofer
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.