@armandodkos Again, you're asking whether head of an org did analyst level work? That's your question, which is irrelevant to his comment?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You're arguing the actual historical practice of State is irrelevant to a story abt Clinton's practices? Hackery.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos No. I'm arguing he made a comment--as was HIS FUCKING JOB--abt rules, not abt history, and you're shifting goalpost to be dumb1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel His job was to comment for a Reuters story? Hackery3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos So yes, when Powell was SoS, his JOB, was to comment to the media, which included Reuters.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm referring to today's Reuters story.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos Yes. Point is that you're asserting guy whose job it was to be final say to media for 6 years now can't be considered credible.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Actually reverse. I'm saying, (what YOU challenged), was what happened when Powell was SoS? you've talked yourself into a knot.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos Which is irrelevant bc rules then and now are same, which is what he commented on and you invented BS attempt to undermine.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel BS! Hackery! State's actual past practices are absolutely central to this.MY question utterly relevant. You're arguing nonsense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@armandodkos LOL. Smooch.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.