@armandodkos He SPECIFICALLY did with State what he SPECIFICALLY did with all other Exec agencies (exc OVP bc Addington).
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ' a simple q - did he review how State handled FGI? Not just policies, practices. Look I don't think you know.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos But effort to say he, as former official spokesperson, can't say what it was his job to say bc Colin Powell is crackpot hackery1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well either he reviewed Powell's practices or he did not. Do you know? I think you don't.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos The logic behind "blowing smoke" comment is same logic that explains why Manning is in prison for 35 years.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not for nothing, but my q was simple and still not answered did he review Colin Powell's practices?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos Again, you're asking whether head of an org did analyst level work? That's your question, which is irrelevant to his comment?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You're arguing the actual historical practice of State is irrelevant to a story abt Clinton's practices? Hackery.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @armandodkos
@armandodkos No. I'm arguing he made a comment--as was HIS FUCKING JOB--abt rules, not abt history, and you're shifting goalpost to be dumb1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel His job was to comment for a Reuters story? Hackery3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@armandodkos Which means when he made comments abt the rules, it was final say (ex OVP). Has testified to courts and congress on same.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.