Here is Chrysler's timeline on the issue http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM483034/RMISC-15V461-1264.pdf …. I find it disingenuous to not even mention us as if we had zero impact.
-
-
Replying to @0xcharlie
@0xcharlie I love the part about how a security vulnerability is not a "defect".5 replies 5 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze May be legally required bc they wouldn't have put that in specs for supplier so fr supplier's perspective, it wasn't. @0xcharlie
12:03 PM - 24 Jul 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.