.@emptywheel Isn't the nuance instead that NSA technical operators didn't understand the nuances of the FISA Ct orders? @Gorman_Siobhan
-
-
Replying to @charlie_savage
.
@emptywheel@Gorman_Siobhan ... that is, the problem came in superimposing FISC's RAS structure onto pre-existing program.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Right. But no way you look at what happened w/PRTT program (the same, in 2004) and think 215 is accidental@Gorman_Siobhan2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charlie_savage wasn't saying it was accidental. The point was that no person at NSA understood all the ins and outs of the prgm2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gorman_Siobhan
@Gorman_Siobhan The record shows they claimed that. Larger record shows (IMO) that that's not credible.@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charlie_savage why not credible that NSA management was so poor and patch worked that they didn't understand their own prgm?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gorman_Siobhan
@Gorman_Siobhan I just think Alexander's claims were always intentionally limited and given full record still not credible.@charlie_savage2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charlie_savage But that doesn't mean NSA mismanagement of these programs wasn't a major issue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gorman_Siobhan
@Gorman_Siobhan Yes, but it's hard to believe that explains not finding continuing PRTT violations in 25 spot checks.@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charlie_savage I'm not saying it does.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Gorman_Siobhan & subsequently released evidence makes the claims he made more dubious still. @charlie_savage
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.