Obama lawyers asked secret court to ignore public court's decision on spying http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/09/obama-fisa-court-surveillance-phone-records … by @attackerman
@attackerman IMO other interesting issue w/request is apparent silence of providers. Are they silent? @KenGude @normative @bmaz @joshrogin
-
-
@emptywheel@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin So we probably shouldn't expect much public -
@normative Again, FreedomWorks' challenge IS public. Does absence of VZ in docket mean no challenge?@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin -
@emptywheel@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin FreedomWorks isn't bound by a gag order -
@normative But it was FISC that made it public. FW specifically did NOT publicize this, even w/in FW@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin -
@emptywheel@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin My guess? VZ will wait for an actual order to issue for any challenge. -
@normative You don't think they've received an order? I do.@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin -
@emptywheel@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin Application filed a week ago, FISC may have taken its time responding to 2nd C. -
@normative@emptywheel I thought FISC gave FW & administration till 6/12 for motions/responses?@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin Well, THEIR challenge would have to go through FISC, not 2nd C. -
@normative Yes, but FreedomWorks' is public. Would theirs be?@attackerman@KenGude@bmaz@joshrogin
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.