On June 8, 2013, James Clapper admitted they use 702 for cyber. https://www.emptywheel.net/2013/06/10/section-702-is-used-for-terror-proliferation-and-hacking/ … Then NSA tried to pretend it hadn't admitted it.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Wait, so NSA is doing something that
@emptywheel is actually okay with??? :) "collection 4 foreign cyberattacks is entirely appropriate."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NathanielDWhite
@NathanielDWhite I'm okay with a lot. But you note that I knew then they were collecting domestic in the name of foreign?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Yeah, just teasing. Your prescient 2013 article says foreign okay, but suggests could be abused for domestic, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NathanielDWhite
@NathanielDWhite Everything NSA has been doing--incl transparency provisions under last fall's USAF--made it clear they get domestic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Get domestic, but can they task domestic? My read is that still limited to connect to foreign power.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NathanielDWhite
@NathanielDWhite Upstream targets selectors, not people in known places. They task first and only detask if they figure out later.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @NathanielDWhite
@NathanielDWhite@emptywheel Issue I'm raising isnt foreign v domestic - it's that we've been told selectors are "communications facility"4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque@emptywheel This was Marcy's point I was highlighting: Upstream targets selectors, not people in known places....2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@NathanielDWhite Same w/PRISM. And, for that matter, USAF. @JakeLaperruque
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.