Via @just_security, how @RandPaul hijacked the surveillance reform debate (and not, in the end, for the better):http://justsecurity.org/23353/rand-paul-hijacked-surveillance-reform/ …
-
-
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck Uh. Guess you missed the points where@RandPaul was raising 12333 and 702.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RandPaul He certainly _mentioned_ them, but where is the push for actual _reforms_ of those authorities?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck@emptywheel@RandPaul Not sure you can really "reform" an Executive Order anyway3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@steve_vladeck@emptywheel@RandPaul A congressional statute trumps an executive order.5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes, but FAA, while appearing to trump, prolly didn't. Congress' choice tho@BradMossEsq@steve_vladeck@RandPaul1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@charlie_savage@steve_vladeck I agree, it didn't. Congress would have to explicitly take that action.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel@steve_vladeck There's no evidence that the executive branch contests the FAA's reform to 12333 viz targeting USPs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlie_savage I disagree. There is evidence. But I haven't written it up to be certain yet. @BradMossEsq @steve_vladeck
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.