Via @just_security, how @RandPaul hijacked the surveillance reform debate (and not, in the end, for the better):http://justsecurity.org/23353/rand-paul-hijacked-surveillance-reform/ …
-
-
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck Uh. Guess you missed the points where@RandPaul was raising 12333 and 702.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RandPaul He certainly _mentioned_ them, but where is the push for actual _reforms_ of those authorities?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck@emptywheel@RandPaul As Wyden said, those are huge, but the Senate consensus isn’t there yet. We have to build it by 2017.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @normative
@normative@emptywheel@RandPaul I couldn't agree more. But do you have any faith that what's happened these past few weeks has _helped_?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck@normative@emptywheel I have no great love for@RandPaul, but I don't see how you blame *him* for stifling larger debate.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SamAdlerBell
@SamAdlerBell@normative@emptywheel@RandPaul I'm not saying he stifled the larger debate; I'm saying he's perpetuating the distraction...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@steve_vladeck He's the only guy who talked abt the issues you care abt. That's utter nonsense. @SamAdlerBell @normative @RandPaul
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.