If @RandPaul is truly going to block debate under all circumstances, he's reversing a position he publicly stated just four days ago
-
-
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque@RandPaul Last night he told reporters that nothing has changed since last week.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NathanielDWhite
@NathanielDWhite@RandPaul These two positions cannot be held consistently http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/exclusive-rand-paul-i-will-force-the-expiration-of-the-patriot-act-118443.html?hp=t1_r …pic.twitter.com/0mOV9Sxdmt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque They're perfectly consistent. No way amended USAF could become law tomorrow.@NathanielDWhite@RandPaul2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@NathanielDWhite@RandPaul Couldnt become law, but could move forward, & that issue was clear Tuesday when stance was different2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JakeLaperruque What, in his quoted statement rather than not entirely accurate report on it, is inconsistent? @NathanielDWhite @RandPaul
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.