Yahoo was complying w/PAA in 6 months even WHILE it was suing to avoid compliance. Why would metadata take longer???
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If you believe the Prism slide, although it got the date for Yahoo wrong, Microsoft was complying w/ PAA 5 weeks after enactment2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Tho fr Yahoo docs it appears actual implementation lasted from Feb to May, so not really 6 months.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Sorry--it can't be Feb. Has to be Dec-Jan, doesn't it. Was thinking of when Yahoo got real request.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I still don't get what you're saying...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage (Tho one assumes the desired system is all-but in place at AT&T and has been since 2003).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Ah. Well maybe apples/oranges. The Yahoo delay was about legal resistance, not technical difficulties.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes, but getting internal records (if they actually got asked, as appears) was likely new.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I just mean, if focus is "6 months isn't long enough," to extent PAA is comparable, Yahoo PAA took 3 days (May 9->May 12)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlie_savage Nah. They were already working w/FBI in January. & there does seem to have been some contention abt WHAT they had to produce
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.