@just_security One of the little treats in USAF is a clarification that Sec. 215 cannot be used to obtain content.
-
-
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@HarleyGeiger One definition of content tied to electronic comms. Not all content.@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@HarleyGeiger@just_security Are the contents of my Visa bill fair game under USA FREEDOM Act?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tinleyharrier
Not under 215, pen/trap, or NSLs, neither under USAF or current law.
@tinleyharrier@emptywheel@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@HarleyGeiger That's because of a different law? Because content exclusion under USAF doesn't cover that.@tinleyharrier@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@tinleyharrier@just_security USAF content exclusion isn't exclusive. Does not imply other content is okay. We pushed for it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@HarleyGeiger This is an honest question. What now prohibits? (Agree on NSLs, mind you)@tinleyharrier@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Good question. I understand DOJ/FISC interprets it to exclude content. Statute is vague, so we pushed to clarify.@tinleyharrier2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@HarleyGeiger And 2010 opinion authorizing financial records? http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/0328/104.%20BR%2010-82%20supplemental%20opinion%20-%20Redacted%2020140328.pdf …@tinleyharrier1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not sure what those records contained. Certainly w/ various records, the content/metadata line is hard to draw.@tinleyharrier2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@HarleyGeiger But what in 215--as opposed to phone dragnet orders--limits to metadata? They get URLs. @tinleyharrier
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.