Also, remember the time that the former Deputy Director of the CIA said "there's quite a bit of content in metadata" http://bit.ly/1Kl9Cy4
@HarleyGeiger That's because of a different law? Because content exclusion under USAF doesn't cover that. @tinleyharrier @just_security
-
-
@emptywheel@tinleyharrier@just_security USAF content exclusion isn't exclusive. Does not imply other content is okay. We pushed for it. -
@HarleyGeiger This is an honest question. What now prohibits? (Agree on NSLs, mind you)@tinleyharrier@just_security -
@emptywheel Good question. I understand DOJ/FISC interprets it to exclude content. Statute is vague, so we pushed to clarify.@tinleyharrier -
@HarleyGeiger And 2010 opinion authorizing financial records? http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/0328/104.%20BR%2010-82%20supplemental%20opinion%20-%20Redacted%2020140328.pdf …@tinleyharrier -
@emptywheel Not sure what those records contained. Certainly w/ various records, the content/metadata line is hard to draw.@tinleyharrier -
@HarleyGeiger But what in 215--as opposed to phone dragnet orders--limits to metadata? They get URLs.@tinleyharrier
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.