@KevinBankston Like fact that that language doesn't apply to non-comm companies? That fact? Paul is wrong but so are boosters @astepanovich
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That is really open to interpretation - but I know you and@LizaGoitein have already discussed the example lang.@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Wait. 2 seconds ago actual language was binding. What changed?@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Paul was saying Verizon - explicitly prohibited, but ECSP just an example of what is exempted@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich@emptywheel@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston why/where is non-comm exempted?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @byersalex
@byersalex Person explicitly may not be ECSP or remote computing corporation.@astepanovich@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@byersalex exempts broad identifiers "such as" ECSP, RCS@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston@emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich@KevinBankston@emptywheel if u ask 4 all Western Union transfers over $1K tho, isnt that clearly afoul of 107(4)(k)(A)(i)(II)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @byersalex
@byersalex This is very basic. Per IC, bulk ONLY means "no discriminators." If it has 2 discriminators (as your WU ex did), it is not-bulk.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel i know you've already shown me this, but remind me where IC definition is codified?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@byersalex There's a footnote in PPD 28 that defines it that way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.