The exact language from USA FREEDOM that prevents "Verizon" from being used as a specific selector term: https://www.leahy.senate.gov/download/hen15686#page=17&zoom=auto,-127,550 …
-
-
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich How dare you introduce facts into politics? How dare you, sir?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Like fact that that language doesn't apply to non-comm companies? That fact? Paul is wrong but so are boosters@astepanovich1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That is really open to interpretation - but I know you and@LizaGoitein have already discussed the example lang.@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Wait. 2 seconds ago actual language was binding. What changed?@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Paul was saying Verizon - explicitly prohibited, but ECSP just an example of what is exempted@LizaGoitein@KevinBankston3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@astepanovich Yes. And I agree (and said long before you guys) he got it wrong. But your logic upholds my read. @LizaGoitein @KevinBankston
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.