Impressed by how confident everyone is about exactly what Roberts did & didn't do. I'm not smart enough to find it anything but murky.
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Has anyone explained why affidavit got released? Would be unusual for ongoing investigation.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel They had already (overtly) seized his computers, so what justification would there be for keeping it under seal?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Aside from preventing copy-cats with even more dubious intentions?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Exactly. That's why I tweeted last night that I was surprised it's still not under seal.@mattblaze2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PogoWasRight
@PogoWasRight@emptywheel If I understand it, the affidavit was filed AFTER they had already (overtly) seized the equipment.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Yes, they filed two days later, it seems.@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PogoWasRight
@PogoWasRight Not in a big rush to see whether he really had tampered with plane still flying I guess.@mattblaze1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@PogoWasRight Says they sent agent to PHL on same day to look at the connector. Wonder what they did with the plane after that.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mattblaze Curiously, guy who filed affy may not have been in interview w/him, and he's a CT agent, not a cyberhackery one. @PogoWasRight
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.