Worth noting: Many of the "no" votes on surveillance-reform were cast by legislators who think bill doesn't go far enough.
-
-
Replying to @JameelJaffer
@JameelJaffer@emptywheel The bill doesn't go far enough.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@JameelJaffer@emptywheel In all seriousness, what are the implications for bulk surveillance on texts, email and data connections?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green "Bulk" on Internet prevented in same way bulk on telephony prevented. Bill actually doesn't distinguish@JameelJaffer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JameelJaffer So I get a warrant with some kind of selector, then run arbitrary search code on providers' logs?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@emptywheel@JameelJaffer What about forced retention? How does that apply to data?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@matthew_d_green No data retention mandate right now. DiFi keeps talking about a "data handshake." https://www.emptywheel.net/2015/05/10/usa-f-redux-dianne-feinstein-raises-the-data-handshake-again/ … @JameelJaffer
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.