@normative Why?
-
-
Replying to @CathyGellis
@CathyGellis Between the grandfather clause & non-expiring 214/NSL authorities, 215 sunset in itself accomplishes nothing. Literally zero.2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Doesn't that ignore 1) what FISC has said abt grandfather 2) that whole 2nd C thing?@CathyGellis1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CathyGellis Refresh my memory re: FISC statements?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative In last order Boasberg made it clear FISC would require justification for using grandfather@CathyGellis1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CathyGellis That’s an awfully sanguine reading of that line.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Boasberg: Tell us why you think we have authority to grant orders under sunset? Seems like legal justification...@CathyGellis1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CathyGellis I parse that as: “Presumably business as usual will continue if there’s a sunset; lay out some boilerplate on that"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative As someone who has read every single declassed phone dragnet order that order was fairly unusual.@CathyGellis2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@CathyGellis Well… in that it’s the first one bumping up against a sunset.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative Um. last I checked, such orders didn't show up in 2009, 2010, or 2011 before "bumping up against sunset." @CathyGellis
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.