Unless, of course, there's something we're not being told about what they're currently doing. Which ... would be notable.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Absolutely there are things we don't know about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich The only logical one is that Burr WAS NOT "misstating" the other day when he said there was an IP dragnet.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Depends on what definition of misstatement you're using, perhaps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Could be one of several things. But for various reasons I don't think he "misstated." Think he tried to lay legislative record1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'll say something about the leg record - Amash's continued statements last night about this allowing bulk did not help it.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich What he said last night is different than what I have said, significantly. But HJC report doesn't help on that front either1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm pretty sure he was using a colloquial definition of bulk. Just a pain to deal with.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Yes. But the BILL uses IC meaningless definition of bulk. Therein lies the problem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not meaningless, necessarily- legally I haven't heard a good alt that has any sort of specificity. Misleading as hell tho.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@astepanovich Supermin would have to be far stronger to provide actual protections on the latter front.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.