Unless, of course, there's something we're not being told about what they're currently doing. Which ... would be notable.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Absolutely there are things we don't know about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich The only logical one is that Burr WAS NOT "misstating" the other day when he said there was an IP dragnet.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Depends on what definition of misstatement you're using, perhaps.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Could be one of several things. But for various reasons I don't think he "misstated." Think he tried to lay legislative record1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'll say something about the leg record - Amash's continued statements last night about this allowing bulk did not help it.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@astepanovich As soon as Congress adopted IC's def of bulk, which is meaningless, leg record was bound to be problematic. More so post 2nd C
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.