2nd Cir 215 ruling is hugely important, but note that they let stand the denial of relief, since it's "just a few more weeks".
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
Given that an injunction is pretty much the only effective relief against natsec (non criminal) surveillance, that seems unfortunate.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
Even when the court's opinion is as unequivocal as here, getting an injunction against national security programs seems almost impossible.
3 replies 4 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Injunction isn't the only possible relief. Now the phone companies have to decide whether to break 2d Cir. law.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Both Sprint and VZ had pursued limited challenges in past. Half-heartedly tho, esp from VZ.@granick3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@granick What's the status of the current order in the 2d Cir? Does this effectively void it?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
@mattblaze No. It assumes the unlawful program will end on June 1, which is interesting bc USAF includes 6 month transition. @granick
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.