2nd Cir 215 ruling is hugely important, but note that they let stand the denial of relief, since it's "just a few more weeks".
-
-
@emptywheel@granick What's the status of the current order in the 2d Cir? Does this effectively void it? -
@mattblaze No. It assumes the unlawful program will end on June 1, which is interesting bc USAF includes 6 month transition.@granick
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@granick Telcos in my experience want whatever legal cover is required to let them make gov't as happy as possible. -
@mattblaze@emptywheel See David Kris on telco int'l politics, toward the end: http://www.lawfareblog.com/2015/05/on-the-second-circuits-section-215-decision/ … -
@granick@emptywheel Yeah, but "providers" covers a wide range. Legacy telcos care a *lot* about keeping gov't happy. -
@mattblaze I think VZ is in a very different place than AT&T.@granick -
@emptywheel@granick Could be. Why do you think? -
@mattblaze I think a BIG part of claims they don't get all phone records is due to VZ being strict abt wording of orders.@granick
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@mattblaze But now there's statutory liability on the table. -
@granick Well, VZ challenged in response to Klayman decision. So same gig.@mattblaze
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.