My take on the Second Circuit's NSA ruling:http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/second-circuit-rules-mostly-symbolically-that-current-text-of-section-215-doesnt-authorize-bulk-surveillance/ …
-
-
Replying to @OrinKerr
@OrinKerr It might be symbolic legally, but it'll have a huge impact on legislative conversation (as you anticipate):http://justsecurity.org/22839/circuit-politics-surveillance-reform/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck I disagree with your point 2, both descriptively and normatively.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OrinKerr
@OrinKerr@steve_vladeck Oh, that's one I want to see you two argue out.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel On the normative, see the end of my post here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/second-circuit-rules-mostly-symbolically-that-current-text-of-section-215-doesnt-authorize-bulk-surveillance/ …@steve_vladeck3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@OrinKerr @steve_vladeck Oh, I had already read it (which is why I noted that FISC takes notice even of magistrate opinions).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.