@SeanVitka @emptywheel @JohnWonderlich - I'm back. Not true that all else is "fair game." Very clearly written as a non-exhaustive list.
-
-
@emptywheel@HarleyGeiger@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich Anything can be abused. This would end bulk collection if faithfully implemented. -
@LizaGoitein It wouldn't. We're talking abt sustaining known programs under carved out language@HarleyGeiger@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@HarleyGeiger@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich Not impossible to end bulk. Impossible to come up with comprehensive list of bad SSTs. -
@emptywheel@HarleyGeiger@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich Hence the non-exhaustive list. Basic statutory interpretation: "such as"=non-exclusive -
@LizaGoitein Note if it said "no corporate" it would still be non-exclusive.@HarleyGeiger@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@LizaGoitein@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich B/c I think the FISC opinion transparency provisions address this problem. -
@HarleyGeiger A SUPERB reason not to implement the most effective way to address it!@LizaGoitein@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich -
@emptywheel@LizaGoitein@SeanVitka "No corporate identifiers" would raise legit real world problems unrelated to mass surveillance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@LizaGoitein@SeanVitka@JohnWonderlich I rank the FISC opinion transparency provisions highly as a reform. Very big deal.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.