@natedogg213 Um.
You know you linked something from 2011, right? Yet more proof you couldn't pass freshman comp.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Nice try. Did the U.S. lose Desert Storm because of the later Iraqi invasion. You conflate different conflicts. So simplistic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natedogg213
@natedogg213 "Different conflicts." Uh huh. Keep boasting of the great victory in Benghazi!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel um, are you really trying to pollute this argument with the so-called “Benghazi scandal”!?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natedogg213
@natedogg213 You do realize that Benghazi is where extremists got first toehold? You do realize we had drones patrolling close to there?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don’t see how this has anything to with the win-loss argument. Would you prefer I send a link w/o the word “Benghazi”?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natedogg213
@natedogg213 I'd prefer if you claim victory you not point to stuff that actually is evidence of loss. Really basic freshman comp stuff.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You really dislike freshmen! Another link: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137073/ivo-h-daalder-and-james-g-stavridis/natos-victory-in-libya … You confuse operational victories with long-term effect.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natedogg213
@natedogg213 Um. Maybe you should see what Daalder now says? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/07/libya-intervention-daalder_n_6809756.html … "situation in Libya...is horrific in many dimensions."3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel validates my point: “If you look at those goals [of NATO intervention] they were all met.” Other factors were also at play.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@natedogg213 And the goals in Iraq and Afghanistan were both met. But both were historic losses, catastrophically so in Iraq case.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.