FBI overstated forensic hair matches in nearly all trials before 2000 http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades/2015/04/18/39c8d8c6-e515-11e4-b510-962fcfabc310_story.html …
-
-
Replying to @susanzalkind
Naive Q maybe but how/why could this have happened? Were FBI agents overzealous +90% of the time or are their analysts just bad at science?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @susanzalkind
@susanzalkind FBI's controls on EVERYTHING they've had reviewed are horrible. So that's surely a part of it.@onekade1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @susanzalkind
@susanzalkind Thinking of IG's long work. Forensic kiosks not safe. They can't count NSLs. They don't track SIGINT source. @onekade
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.