@attackerman Cause if govt has to release those pics, gotta make sure no one gets charged. @brettmaxkaufman @jameeljaffer @just_security
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm not being cute. I don't even understand this, like the dumb kid at the seder.@brettmaxkaufman@jameeljaffer@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman What's w/urge for understanding? It's a legal tactic, nothing more.@brettmaxkaufman@jameeljaffer@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I grant you, but I wonder if it has any internal logic beyond "Nuh-uh"@brettmaxkaufman@jameeljaffer@just_security2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
@attackerman Again, what's with this fetishization of logic?@brettmaxkaufman@jameeljaffer@just_security1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel is it really a fetish to want to make sure I'm not misunderstanding?@brettmaxkaufman@jameeljaffer@just_security2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
.
@attackerman It's basically treating court-compelled disclosure like a leak. The executive has the privilege & hasn't voluntarily waived it2 replies 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage that's a... novel criterion for what constitutes official disclosure.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attackerman
.
@attackerman I think the footnote's wording was a little clumsy. The real q is what constitutes official waiver: can it be involuntary2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage@attackerman They've previously argued that disclosures by former and anonymous officials, intel commiittees don't count.2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
@JameelJaffer Also reminded of fight over whether Walker could force Admin to show al-Haramain surveil log @charlie_savage @attackerman
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.