@onekade But they did not have FISA warrants on him, and I can't imagine an XKS query that would have captured him (unless focus on Russian)
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel they don't need warrants or FISA orders to find something sketchy via upstream. They either didn't find it or [something bad]2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel why do they need 702? That's not how they run taps on cables and process the Internet through NARUS systems! That's 12333, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@onekade so they do XKS scores on [ ] people/year, but not on people on terrorists list whom other countries have warned about?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @occbaystreet
@occbaystreet They can't do XKS on US persons w/o a FISA order. They can do XKS on stuff like "chechen bomb threat"@onekade2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@onekade easier 2 collect on +basic/triggered searches on everyone than sp. searches on ppl reasonably supsected of terrorism?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @occbaystreet
@occbaystreet Where they do collect on everyone they have rules about querying, but those are looser overseas.@onekade3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@onekade They had russian language social media, for instance, which means 51% certainty of overseas connection is a cinch.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@occbaystreet Assuming they don't check IP. But that's not where he would have done search. @onekade
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.