You can argue legality of that later killing all you want (I will argue), but being there for both means Petraus will always have O's balls.
-
-
-
Replying to @lib_ertarian_
@lib_ertarian_ Not as much. No reason to believe Holder was in on the first attempt.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel one imagines that lawyers were consulted to give legal fig leaf for assassinating a citizen for speech only far from a battle3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lib_ertarian_
@emptywheel so maybe it's just Obama's John Yoo equivalent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lib_ertarian_
@lib_ertarian_ Holder seems to have briefed mid-Jan that it was needed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel point being Obama has a John Yoo for killing citizens. something Yoo wasn't willing to do or Bush wd hv killed Awlaki1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lib_ertarian_
@lib_ertarian_ That doesn't make any sense. It really misunderstands Awlaki's history entirely.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel maybe. anyway Barron wd be Obama's John Yoo.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@lib_ertarian_ Oh, absolutely, with added bonus that he, like Bybee, got a Appellate position out of it. But that came later.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.