Stingray security though obscurity. This is like catnip for @mattblaze.http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/business/a-police-gadget-tracks-phones-shhh-its-secret.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share …
-
-
Replying to @jvagle
Reasons given for secrecy of LE cell site simulators ("StingRays") just don't pass the smell test. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/business/a-police-gadget-tracks-phones-shhh-its-secret.html … (via
@jvagle)9 replies 52 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze Think it's possible secrecy serves to hide more systematic obligations when getting one.@jvagle1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jvagle What kind of obligations are you thinking of?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze I can imagine that the FBI would be happy to have a national network of bespoke Stingrays. @jvagle
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.