@astepanovich Raises interesting questions if the majority of 215 orders are data flow.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not only 215. You've talked about all the other programs you think they have to get internet metadata.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Right. They're still doing something funky w/PCTDD. But if 215 is--as FBI claims--central to cyber then prolly data flow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Says smarter people than me, based off this. https://www.emptywheel.net/2015/02/26/fbi-now-claiming-section-215-which-is-different-than-the-phone-dragnet-has-a-big-role-in-hacking-investigations/ …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Where'd you get 5 dragnet orders? Isn't it 4/year/provider?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Each docket is one number for all providers. All secondaries have same docket number.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Ah good call. Gotcha. Also, I hadn't seen this timeline before - it's awesome!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Thank you. I am not exaggerating when I say I've read them all.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Marcy - you are the Magnussen of national security <3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sherlock_characters#Charles_Augustus_Magnussen …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@astepanovich Just a teeny tiny corner. But the phone dragnet? Perhaps.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.