Me, in @thehill this morning> For surveillance reform, this is the last 100 dayshttp://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/233672-the-last-100-days …
@astepanovich Big parts of 215 can't be moved there. Not even clear "connection chaining" can. @lib_ertarian_ @thehill
-
-
@emptywheel@lib_ertarian_@thehill but bulk collection likely could. We still want that to end, right? -
@astepanovich It's not even clear NSA would want phone records w/o connection chaining, bc if they did they would.@lib_ertarian_@thehill -
@emptywheel@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill then why do they record en masse Internet Traffic. -
@weems They're NOT getting Internet metadata via PRTT. Getting it via 215 and 702 and 12333.@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill -
@emptywheel@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill 12333 never expires so if 702 and 215 expire they're still covered. smh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill I don’t see any obvious obstacle to chaining under 214…. -
@normative Then you know what connection chaining is? Cause no one else does.@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill -
@emptywheel@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill Presumably chaining across connections between accounts other than contact. -
@normative So where are you pulling that from PRTT that a provider won't say is content?@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill -
@emptywheel@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill 50 USC §1842(d)(2)(C) -
@normative Definitely agree they might try. Yet they haven't yet to get what they're missing, AFAWK.@astepanovich@lib_ertarian_@thehill
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.