@emptywheel re list of crimes on FBI 28 & Litt's list, I think crime referrals (derivative)≠crimes where 702 can be used as direct evidence
-
-
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage But even if that's right, is the derivative use new?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Who knows given shenanigans re 702derived notice? Also DOJ has never used 702 as direct evidence to date, so new limits=shrug2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage@emptywheel Worth noting that DOJ would not give notice if it believed prosecution derived ONLY from 702 metadata.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
Is there anywhere that I missed a public version of FBI 702 targeting procedures or equivalent to USSID 18?
@PatrickCToomey@emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage No. Not that I can think of. @PatrickCToomey
7:53 AM - 23 Feb 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.