@Uncle_Jimbo how many US lives would you have been ok with losing in that effort?
@Uncle_Jimbo Moreover, fact that you won't call for actually paying for it suggests you're not REALLY committed to it. @jeremyscahill
-
-
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill I'm fine paying for wars & I do. But this oak the rich thing is kinda stale. Romney can't pay for everything -
@Uncle_Jimbo Again, the policies you'd like to return to came with FAR FAR higher top tax rates. This is very basic math.@jeremyscahill -
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill Math isn't the problem. Your policy prescription that nat sec must be paid for but social programs are free is -
@Uncle_Jimbo Again, you're reverting to your stale partisan frame. I talked infrastructure, which is NatSec issue.@jeremyscahill -
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill If you want to protect Critical Infrastructure sure, if you are talking "shovel ready" jobs, then not so much -
@Uncle_Jimbo LOL. That's batshit crazy. But I'm sure our adversaries like to hear "NatSec hawks" make the claim.@jeremyscahill
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.