I wonder whether increased US consumer good reliance on branding, not product, in recent years makes us unfit for ideological fight?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think there is some truth to that, but the neo-liberal tendency to marketize everything (obfuscating) plays into it as well.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @seanpaulkelley
@seanpaulkelley Increasingly believe that's why US has been so stubborn at attempting to regime change Bolivarists.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No question about that. But I don't think neo-liberalism can be solely equated with just USA. There are many adherents in Europe1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seanpaulkelley
@seanpaulkelley Sure. But ultimately it's our ideology on offer.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Was Hayek American? He's one of the founders. Austrians play a large role.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seanpaulkelley
@seanpaulkelley He's their "philosopher." He became an ideology in the US thought.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not in dispute. It is identified with the US, but look at Mont Pelerin Society membership list? Global. http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Mont%20Pelerin%20Society%20Directory%202010.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@seanpaulkelley That's a recent list, no? Think if you go back to funding at founding, it's not so intl.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.