@empiricalerror @dametzger US persons cannot be legally targeted under FAA 702 or EO 12333, only with an individual FISA warrant
-
-
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces@dametzger That does not apply to tech personnel w/ access to raw SIGINT -- that's the "Dual Authorities" reference.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
@empiricalerror@dametzger Okay but what does that in practice mean, when tech people have such access? Can they read it, or exfiltrate it?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces@dametzger They obviously can. Case in point: Snowden himself.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
@empiricalerror@dametzger > in a legible form, which is actually "processed data"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces@dametzger That's not how they understand "raw SIGINT data". The collection systems already do a fair amount of processing...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
@electrospaces@dametzger ... into legible form.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
@empiricalerror@dametzger Yes, but only what is filtered out is stored. But wasn't that remark about raw data related to the 215 metadata?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces My comments abt raw data include 215, bc it's a gaping hole in security. Snowden's did not tho.@empiricalerror@dametzger1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@empiricalerror@dametzger Are there any sources for Snowden having had access to the 215 collection?6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@electrospaces To be clear, 3 kinds of vulnerabilities on tech side: 1) tech people who need to process raw data @empiricalerror @dametzger
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.