@emptywheel How so? They previously had plenary discretion to use 702 intel in criminal prosecution (though, apparently, rarely did.)
-
-
-
@normative Let's check the transcript, but think he said, "now that it's public, we can use." Also, now that courts have denied review. -
@emptywheel I took that as a pragmatic recognition that disclosure fears less salient in preventing criminal use. -
@normative I don't know. It appears 3 apparent certs under PAA were each specific, tho they claimed FG one could be used for terrorism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel A new NSA/Govt redefinition of terms: Reform = Expansion Our brave new world of Doublespeak -
@joanneleon Well, I happen to think USAF included some expansion too. I'm not joined by many in that, but that's what I believe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Expansion how? They previously had plenary discretion to use 702 intel for crimes. -
@normative Also, note clear precisely what back door language was approved, use limitations on certs. Bet they wrote new certs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel maybe it's so much worse than we know and that actually is reform?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel False speechThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.