Due respect to .@emptywheel but not sure on what basis she presumes issue referenced by Wyden was actually illegal. https://www.emptywheel.net/2015/02/04/doj-says-its-not-legally-required-to-tell-wyden-whether-executive-branch-conduct-was-legal/ …
@BradMossEsq Besides this being the response DOJ gives every time they don't prosecute illegal stuff authorized by finding?.
-
-
@emptywheel Yes, I'm referring to actual evidence. The presumption may be accurate but any real evidence to back that up? -
@BradMossEsq I could explain it to you, but it'd decline into a tedious thread where I have to do basic reading for you, again. I'll pass. -
@emptywheel I'll take that as a "no, I had no actual evidence" response. That's fine. Opinions are allowed still. Carry on. -
@BradMossEsq No, it's "You've a well-established record of missing both evidence and logic and it's not my job to do basic work for you." -
@emptywheel Uh uh. M'kay. Keep digging. -
@emptywheel Maybe I should join your world where I can make bold claims and declare myself the winner based on my inferences -
@BradMossEsq Again. I said I was passing on explaining to you basic evidence again. I pass. Bye.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.