@BradMossEsq Yes. But given that @MarkSZaidEsq has repeatedly refused to publicly or privately explain, I waited. @JesselynRadack
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack I've said repeatedly it was inaccurate testimony2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq yes. And it must be or you would have testified. But it came in nevertheless.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack You're an armchair qb who has never been on the field.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq That may be your opinion. But that doesn't change the transcript or sworn testimony.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack Doesn't mean it's true! Do you not comprehend that? Or are you that biased?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I have said MANY TIMES it can't be true, otherwise prosecution would have called you.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack You didn't say it couldn't be true in your last article, or am I not seeing that?3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I said it was not entered for fact. That is the exact value of the evidence.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack That's a completely different issue and you know it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq As I said when I write article NOT abt evidence jury heard, will include it! @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.