@MarkSZaidEsq Well, it was not best journalism to leave your and Krieger's names out, as it's public record @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack Would it have been good journalism to ask for comment?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Yes. But given that@MarkSZaidEsq has repeatedly refused to publicly or privately explain, I waited.@JesselynRadack1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack I've said repeatedly it was inaccurate testimony2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq yes. And it must be or you would have testified. But it came in nevertheless.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack You're an armchair qb who has never been on the field.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq That may be your opinion. But that doesn't change the transcript or sworn testimony.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack Doesn't mean it's true! Do you not comprehend that? Or are you that biased?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I have said MANY TIMES it can't be true, otherwise prosecution would have called you.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack If you don't believe it's true then why do you keep asking me to explain it?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq BC IN ADDITION to my repeated explanations to people it can't be true it'd prolly help explain @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.