@MarkSZaidEsq The ONLY thing presented at trial that connected Sterling w/going to press on nukes was that. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Which didn't identify him, wasn't true, and was a rumor.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I don't dispute that, but that's NOT what the jury heard. Which is what I was reporting.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq That's your opinion it was most "damning". Did you interview even ONE juror?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq So your claims is ONLY thing that ties Sterling to press is not damning?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq How on the world can you even say it's the only tie? And, no, not most damning.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Because I actually attended the trial, which you didn't? Because it was?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq You think bc you sat through testimony that makes you an expert on law or natsec?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Sorry. Where did I say that? I didn't. You're straw manning again, as usual.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Let's be specific then. Who knows more about this case? Me or you?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq Had they learned what Sterling's wife had said? More damning. Had Stone's FBI 302 come in? More. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.