@BradMossEsq Yes. But given that @MarkSZaidEsq has repeatedly refused to publicly or privately explain, I waited. @JesselynRadack
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack I've said repeatedly it was inaccurate testimony2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq yes. And it must be or you would have testified. But it came in nevertheless.@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack You're concocting legal strategy you have no idea about. You know nothing from behind the scenes2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq So when I write abt facts--not Hunt's sworn claims--fair to say you weren't lawyer who called?@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack I talk to CIA all the time. I don't know what conv. that was referred. I said no such statement.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack So, you never made the call and never named Sterling as the story suggests?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@HelpSnowden Story doesn't say he named Sterling--says she learned lawyers in Q were Sterling's.@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Sorry, was referencing this story: http://bit.ly/1Cgqxy3@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadack1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@emptywheel which this was part of, see image quote from same article@MarkSZaidEsq@BradMossEsq@JesselynRadackpic.twitter.com/t7wM8tlAxS
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@HelpSnowden Two errors there. Wasn't Gilbey's testimony. @MarkSZaidEsq @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.