@MarkSZaidEsq Did you even read the article? You seem not to, especialy not the caveats. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq I read your article. To say "most damning" is false and nothing but a clear personal attack.4 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Now maybe you don't think ONLY thing incriminated him--albeit not entered for fact--not damning?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq You knew it referred to me, and I denied it. Yet you didn't bother to say that in your article. Hmm2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Look. Hunt fucked you bc case was in trouble. But you haven't bothered to explain what ref was.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq The reference was what FBI claims CIA said was a rumor from my firm about an unknown client.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq That's your explanation. Not Hunt's, so not what jury heard.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq I would have testified. Not my call. I don't second guess my colleagues who know more than you2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I have said to those who have asked that 1) Hunt was desperate 2) obv can't be true.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Did you write that in your article?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq No. Bc article was abt what jury heard. No one said, "if this were true, Olshan would call Zaid" @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.